User talk:Piotrus
: 632
: 82
: 6
: 22
 You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.
|
|
Please start all new discussions at the bottom of this page and include a heading. When in doubt, click the "New Section" button above. |
|---|
|
If I left you a message on your talk page, please answer it there by indenting one line and starting your response with a ping: {{Ping|Piotrus}} If you leave me a message here on my talk page, I will answer your message here by pinging you. |
|---|
|
Always sign your message (by clicking the sign button or by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~). Thanks in advance. |
|---|
|
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. | |
Some general observations on Wikipedia governance being broken and good editors trampled by the system
Lurking stats
[edit]| Page views for this talk page over the last 90 days | ||
|---|---|---|
Detailed traffic statistics |
DYK for Big Three (World War II)
[edit]
On 22 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Big Three (World War II), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that there could have been as many as five individual leaders of the Big Three in World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Big Three (World War II). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Big Three (World War II)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 15,473 views (644.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2025 – nice work! |
"Wesołych Świąt" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Wesołych Świąt has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 23 § Wesołych Świąt until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:18, 23 April 2025 (UTC)